C is my expertise, but it can't match the productivity of python or Ruby Fortnately for C, it will always retain the performance crownm so it will always have its uses
The same thing cannot be said for python. Once its performance is once its performance is matched by a better language such as Ruby, python will be history. Python is so messed up, the only explanation is that the people making it up are blindly following misguided principles. The biggest lie/joke is that "there is only one way to do something in python" On Jan 22, 9:21 pm, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 22, 8:21 pm, Tycon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would gladly throw python away if only ruby matched its performance. > > There's another option you may be interested, in case you haven't > heard of it: C. It's *very* fast. > > > On Jan 22, 3:48 pm, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 22, 1:14 pm, Tycon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This is another example of the flawed, broken code known as "Paste". > > > > Pylons should decouple itself from Paste > > > > But Pylons, as you've pointed out, is flawed in numerous ways as well. > > > Let's throw it *all* away! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
