thanks wayne. this is an acceptable workaround, i've been using a chained validator that does something similar, but it probably makes sense to just use something like yours.
i implemented my workaround as a chained validator because if this is indeed a bug, when it gets fixed, i can just take out the chained validator... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
