W liście Mike Orr z dnia środa, 8 kwietnia 2009: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Reid <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is that not going to kill Python; especially if I am serving enormous > > files at high speeds to multiple users? It also needs to support > > concurrent connections to the same resource as well as starting > > offsets for download managers? > > If the system will be serving disproportionately more static files > than dynamic pages, then at some point Python will not be able to keep > up, and you'll have to serve the files from Apache with a non-Python > authorization system. WebKit was not designed for this situation. >
I don't know about Apache, but with lightppd or ngnix in the front you could modify static middleware not to stream the file, but instead return empty respone with X-Sendfile header - then lighty or nginx would pick up the file and stream it to client. The header has sligthly different name and meaning in one of those servers, I don't recall which one. -- Paweł Stradomski --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
