On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Noah Gift <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I said I would get this done this weekend, so here it is:
>>
>> If you check out go-pylons.txt and the README.txt, it shows that I
>> simply added a resource directory that will contain all of the code
>> for a framework.  Next I added these lines to the go-pylons.py
>> boostrap script:
>>
>> #hack to install local source code
>>   path = "resources"
>>   for dir in os.listdir(path):
>>       source_dir = "%s/%s" % (path,dir)
>>       subprocess.call([join(bin_dir, 'easy_install'),
>>       source_dir])
>>
>> This should work for any framework, but I need to write something to
>> parse a setup.py and then run:
>> easy_install -eb resources "found egg"
>> "found egg" being the egg found in setup.py
>>
>> http://bitbucket.org/noahgift/bootstrap_pylons/
>>
>> At this point it only took about 5 lines a code, but if we want to
>> automatically parse setup.py it may take a bit more work.  I wonder
>> what Ian thinks of this?  Anyone feel free to slice, and dice, and
>> fix.
>
> I gave it a test run on Linux.  According to the output, it installed
> resources/pylons, and then downloaded all the dependencies.  The
> virtualenv has everything installed in the easy_install manner (i.e.,
> .egg directories).

Note, that I didn't "really" have all the dependencies, I just pylons
in there.  It was good for testing, but I need to finish that part,
and automate it into a script.  Ideally someone could run a
pre-boostrap config script that pulls all of these raw source files
into the resources directory.

>
> It looks like a good start.  Four comments:
>
> - I would rename resources/pylons to resources/Pylons so that it's
> clear it's a source directory and not a package or a preinstalled
> package.  I had to guess from the contents what it was.

will do.

>
> - Virtualenv is going to automatically install pip soon, so I would do
> a pip-based install.  For now you can put pip in resouces,
> easy_install it, and then pip install the rest.  That would eliminate
> most of the entries in easy-install.pth.  (One problem is that pip
> doesn't install from source directories without the -e option.  I
> don't know why that is.)

sounds good.  I also like the idea of including a boostrapped
setuptools and pip as well.  I recently saw a new failure
in which setuptools required a newer version of itself.  It would be
nice if someone downloaded a tar.gz of this, and simply
ran go-pylons.py and things work, zero dependencies on anything...

>
> - Is there some advantage to putting the source directories in
> resources/ unpacked rather than just copying the tarballs from
> http://pylonshq.com/download ?  Since easy_install/pip know how to
> unpack them, I'm not sure if the slight added efficiency is worth it.

I agree too.  I just didn't know where they lived.  Also, one PITA is
that I need a parser to strip out the dependencies from setup.py
so I can pipe that into a script..this is basic a build script to
generate the resources needed for this bootstrap package.

>
> - Is there a way to call easy_install without using subprocess?  I'm
> always leery of scripts that call subprocesses, since they can break
> if the path or environment isn't what's expected.  But that may be an
> advanced issue to deal with later.

Hmm, that might be an issue on Windows, but I don't run Windows much,
your right.  I might have to punt on this until I figure out a better
way.

>
> --
> Mike Orr <[email protected]>
>
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,

Noah

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to