> > I guess that's not the most secure thing to do but if you want you could > > try to write your own OpenID implementation. It might be possible that I > > have oversimplified everything and there are more steps to make OpenID > > secure. I really doubt that OpenID authors were that stupid so they have > > not thought about secure cookies ;-) > > It's a prefectly valid thing to do, and I do not see why you should not > do that. The standard python openid implementation encourages this type > of approach by making the store pluggable.
what's the "The standard python openid implementation" ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
