On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Mike Burrows (asplake) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Shailesh, > > Yes I'm aware of (and use) the rest decorators. I kinda like though > the simplification of having all routing in one place, and (although > this is perhaps a more personal thing) having a good source of meta > data describing the application - it seems a pity to me to hide all > this information inside decorators that provide no protocol for > extracting it again.
Routes will eventually have failure routes (aka. status-changing routes). Currently it has only redirect routes. Failure routes would allow you to set a 4xx or 5xx error directly in the routing; e.g., for URLs that have gone away or are under maintenance. -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
