So does this mean that Marco is entirely different framework and no relation with Pylons? I had impression that Pylons 2.0 shall be called as meta framework.
Do we have any document or discussion to understand where the Pylons lacks and how Marco solves the problem? On Dec 30, 10:24 am, Graham Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 30 Dec 2009, at 03:17, Chris wrote: > > > In the Pylons roadmap wiki page, it mentions a mysterious ;) new meta > > framework called Marco. Is this hosted anywhere? I'd like to just > > poke around and see where it is headed. > > It's early days yet but ... > > Project home is on > coactivate:http://www.coactivate.org/projects/pypefitters/summary > > Source is hosted on bitbucket:http://bitbucket.org/chrism/marco/ > > I have a few pages of preliminary notes:http://bel-epa.com/notes/Marco/ > > Cheers, > > Graham > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghiggins > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iEYEARECAAYFAks64/wACgkQOsmLt1Nhivwf8gCeJsb2/50VDTXlvnYL44uHIGa/ > IPEAn0I1g2TJYvjJplVbdY84bNz38EtKiQCVAgUBSzrj/FnrWVZ7aXD1AQKpiQQA > kQBZcJUb5XxJzzvzRTNfRzvOAFR1L07CIxpUvGGQjwKNHogjXr+6iELfxYc2Yr4M > LCH532zUvJDaEmD/OrOxE4iat/28dWwlIfgdpWLIY0GUMPukhTTD0uKdazN1lC35 > vaM49foBOvcpiULgIYqRypLWlMFgHxNrI7V+GLOO19c= > =Gtw/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
