On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Vladimir Dronnikov <dronni...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Suppose A buys B manufactured by C. When A or C go out of scope (die, >>> e.g.), it doesn't mean the end of B, right? >> >> It all depends on what the resource is. Often with /A/B/C, C is a >> logical subcategory of B, and B of A. So if B ceases to exist, all C's >> disappear too. >> > > Hmm. Consider Toyota has manufactured a dozen of certain cars. I > _hardly_ imagine if Toyota drops (ever:) those dozen of cars will > _immediately_ disappear too.
Consider a site of incidents (i.e., situations you're responding to or have responded to) containing entries (reports of specific things you've done, photos, etc). Deleting an entry should not affect the incident. But deleting the incident should delete all entries because they refer to an incident which doesn't exist, one which you've specifically said you don't care about. -- Mike Orr <sluggos...@gmail.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
