Sure - as soon as I receive my registration email - it has been a few minutes now...
Personally, I would be happy to see a decorator-free Pylons but I say that without knowing what our action methods will look like without them! Regards, Mike On Feb 11, 4:37 pm, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mike Burrows <[email protected]> wrote: > > So... anyone else interested? > > I'm not sure, it's kind of complex to make a quick decision on. Could > you make a link to your proposal in the @validate reorganization > ticket? Then we can consider it for Pylons 1.1. My inclination at > this point is to get rid of @validate as a decorator, to be replaced > by something in the action. > > http://pylonshq.com/project/pylonshq/ticket/405 > -- > Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
