On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Noah Gift <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Chris, but in terms of the future, it does seem like a open > standard for building core functionality, like wsgi, could be useful for > Pylons apps. Isn't this what you and Ben are working on?
Chris and Ben are working on a component architecture (Marco) for plugging in framework components (configuration, routing, dispatch, request/response). The basic layer is for framework developers (a future version of Pylons). Application developers can latch into it for application components if they want, or keep building apps the traditional way. I don't know how useful it would be for dynamic plugins that change at runtime. Maybe. But Marco won't be ready for building applications with for another several months. -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
