-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25 May 2010, at 23:19, Mike Orr wrote:
If you restrict SQLAlchemy to the 0.5 series
I think you misread this:
something like "SQLAlchemy>=0.5,<=0.6"
My reasoning is that the lack of an upper limit seems to imply an unwarranted assumption that arbitrary future SQLA releases will be back-compatible with Pylons project templates written for SQLA 0.5 (or, in extremis, 0.6) releases.
I'm wondering whether "SQLAlchemy>=0.5" isn't actually a needless and potentially troublesome imprecision that would be trivial to correct at this stage of the game.
- -- Cheers, Graham http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghiggins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkv8pfoACgkQOsmLt1Nhivx8gACdH9NuDVsqyiYjw98onZ2zcpcs X8MAoKhskDCBp0t2AWn2C03HRYznu9NGiQCVAgUBS/yl+lnrWVZ7aXD1AQIZOAP+ JXURDaN/SYZrjw7gAEhVcqsTqMlUz6Fc/wlbidvSVxkOkxW/prEG6II+BlqlR/yP xbns1k/pJK0gf+FK8WsCwAfxOGyj5BXDl+ajhbkPQ7uROEv+Mo6c7PE6j1abh1HP RFNW9LbUqgFuL0/J9m6eUmR4TyHlaID7uHY+8J4KVFM= =3k8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
