On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ben Bangert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 7, 2010, at 12:01 PM, dusans wrote: > >> Will there be a python 3.x version also? > > The lead developer of repoze.bfg, Chris McDonough co-authored this PEP for a > WSGI-type Python 3 compat. adapter: > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/ > > So when that is approved, and has an implementation (which we'll try and help > with as well), we absolutely plan on having a Python 3.x version. Having a > larger development team now will definitely make it a lot easier.
This is some other work by the team that is now giving you Pyramid. A lot of work has gone into how to adapt WSGI for Pylons 3, whether a simplified WSGI 2 API is worthwhile, or whether it's time to go beyond WSGI to a new protocol such as Web3. I'm in the Web3 camp, and am glad ChrisM has advanced it to a PEP. The Pylons-Turbogears-BFG developers are actually the majority of WSGI developers (at least those that show up to the WSGI PyCon sprint), and some of them are ready to just implement a new protocol rather than waiting for the Web-SIG to reach a consensus (which it hasn't for two or three years now). (I have suggested a higher-level WebOb-based protocol.) Of course everything would still have WSGI adapters, but it would also have adapters for the new protocol, whose most viable contender at this point is Web3. -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
