Am 09.11.2010 20:03 schrieb Mike Orr:
Still, the idea of the catchy links is good. We could have a "What's the difference?" link next to it.
I think the barebone Pyramid should be labelled something like "core" or "base". Most people would understand what that means. Not sure what would be the right catchy label for the high-level stuff then.
Perhaps TurboGears can be renamed to show a closer relationship to Pyramid, without being "THE (one and only) high-level Pyramid framework". Perhaps a "Pyramid with Batteries" kind of something. Ben had suggested Gears, but I said Google may have trademark objections about that. But maybe "Pyramid Gears" as a full name would work.
We are currently brainstorming the name for TG 3 in the TurboGears devel team. I'll throw that in.
-- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
