Any reason why just passing **kwargs through wouldn't fit the need? That's exactly what I did in my own home-cooked helpers.
On Jul 19, 7:34 pm, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Ross Vandegrift <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Any reason why select() doesn't support taking disabled as a keyword > > args like the other input tags? Is something like the below desirable? > > The helpers were written a few years ago before 'disabled' and other > attributes became popular. There are some other related tickets in the > bugtracker. > > Boolean attributes and other HTML 5 > enhancementshttps://bitbucket.org/bbangert/webhelpers/issue/46/html-5-enhancements > > "data-" > attributeshttps://bitbucket.org/bbangert/webhelpers/issue/55/cant-pass-html5-da... > > We need somebody who uses these features to propose a general way to > handle them, and to implement it. Would you like to work on this? > > -- > Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
