On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Michael Merickel <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ben was investigating the idea of tying pyramid_beaker to a transaction, > but I'm not sure if anything ever came of it. Maybe we should resurrect the > idea. > It seems to make sense. In fact, an argument could be made that if a transaction fails, the entire contents of the view callable should not execute... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
