Lately ( as a side effect of growth I expect ), I've noticed another wave of emails on the lists bemoaning the inclusion of the ZCA, zcml, zodb and traversal in pyramid. I suppose it's natural that people don't read defense-of-architecture docs when first coming to an framework, but it's also natural that people like Chris will get sick of defending their choices over and over again. ( kudos for being as polite as you have been! )
I'm wondering, does anyone have any good ideas on how we can improve this? I think Chris et. al. have done a great job of making it all optional, and invisible if you don't want to use it, but it seems to me that if possible, maybe more could be done to explain why these are all very useful parts of the framework for users looking at pyramid as an option. Would more example pages be useful? more blog posts? I have been tossing around starting a python blog to write more about our experiences. I don't know whether that would be useful, or more example apps, or what. thanks Iain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
