On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 12:28:06 PM UTC-8, Mike Orr wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> Does anyone know of a better name than 'sqlahelper'? > > "helper" does seem a bit broad and not particularly descriptive (no > offense). I.e., what exactly is it helping me to do? The only alternative I > can think of is "hub", as in SQLAHub, but I'm not sure that's much better.
I like 'SQLAHub'. There's a precent in Python web frameworks for 'hub' as a database rendevous point, though it's been so many years I don't remember where I saw it. Changing the name would have three other benefits: (1) No need for backward compatibility code in the new module, (2) jettison the long revision history that dates back to 'pyramid_sqla' and is irrelevent now, (3) it's a shorter name. 'sqlahelper' was pretty long as a module name in code. -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
