Hi, On 7 January 2012 09:21, Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> wrote:
> > looking at how you implemented > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sloecode/sloecode/trunk/revision/141 > , i would really suggest that you add a memory cache function to > this. rendering doesn't take much work, but there can be dozens of js/ > css files. > > Yeah, I think you may be right - I still need to do some performance tests, although we're really not worried about performance too much with sloecode. Thanks everyone for the pointers - I at least have a solution that works, although with a bit more tweaking I think I can improve the situation. Cheers, -- Thomi Richards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
