On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 19:46 +0100, Arndt Droullier wrote: > Hi, > since zope.component has been removed from pyramid dependencies could > the pyramid registry be used in a similar way like > zope.component.registry.Components ? > Or are both altogether different? > > I mean used for simple registration and querying based on interfaces. > Not a replacement for all zope.component supported features. > > Thanks, Arndt.
Yes, you should be much more pleased with this lightweight version. - C PS: we just moved the Components code from zope.component.registry to zope.interface.registry. So it's the same code, just with a different name. So it's exactly the same thing, except much cooler, because it has a new name. ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
