Raoul - You've got nginx configured to serve static files directly, right? If not, that'll really improve your system.
On Jan 30, 12:48 pm, Raoul Snyman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 January 2012 19:20, cd34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You could use uwsgi (http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/) which I think is > > a lot better than using fastcgi. However, if fastcgi/reverse proxy are > > your only choices, I think I would choose paster with a reverse proxy. > > As much as it sounds like overkill, I'm using nginx as a reverse proxy > to Apache+mod_wsgi. It means that I have an easy WSGI setup, and a > blazingly fast site. I used this blog post as my starting > point:http://markmaunder.com/2009/12/01/how-to-handle-1000s-of-concurrent-u... > > -- > Raoul Snyman > B.Tech Information Technology (Software Engineering) > E-Mail: [email protected] > Web: http://www.saturnlaboratories.co.za/ > Blog: http://blog.saturnlaboratories.co.za/ > Mobile: 082 550 3754 > Registered Linux User #333298 (http://counter.li.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
