On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Chris McDonough <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 12:55 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > > > > - Tempita: our form/field generating system uses tempita as > > a light > > > fast template language for tiny templates, this could be > > replaced > > > > > > Almost any other templating system would be better here as > > tempita is > > unmaintained. Any of Mako, Jinja2 or Chameleon would work; > > each is Py3 > > compat. > Thanks Chris. I guess in this case I meant "easy to integrate". A lot of the templates are like, 2 lines long, and are embedded in a dictionary in the consuming class. it was just really easy to add tempita when I decided that standard string subbing wasn't going to cut it. I'll look into using chameleon or mako instead. Mako might be better for this use even though I use Chameleon normally. Thanks for the input. > > If it's only about creating Pyramid scaffolding, Pyramid now > > has code > > generation facilities built in to it. See > > > http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/1.3-branch/narr/scaffolding.html > > > > > > > > > > Is this api compatible with pastescript code generation or will it > > require a fair bit of retooling? I gather you are replacing > > pastescript because of the maintenance/documentation/python3 > > situation? > > Yes. It's pretty close to compatible. The docs explain what needs to > change. > Awesome, thanks for this addition. I love PasteScript, but don't love it's maintenance situation. iain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
