Sorry, you mentioned your version of the docs in response to a similar comment that I made and I didn't reply.
I did find your explanation very helpful in breaking down the explanations into digestible chunks - I'd very much support that yours should be merged into the main documents. Ben On 22 February 2012 17:43, Michael Merickel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Vanasco > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> 1. A nice paragraph or two giving an overview of the scope / style of >> Security that is offered , and why you might want to use it. ( even >> the first bit of >> http://readthedocs.org/docs/pyramid/en/1.0-branch/narr/security.html >> is too intense for this ). >> > > Linking to docs for version 1.0 is probably a bad idea. Anyway there was a > thought of incorporating > http://michael.merickel.org/projects/pyramid_auth_demo/ into the docs in > some way if anyone wants to comment on it. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
