Sorry to unearth an old thread, but as I was looking for the same answers without success, I'll post my researches here: - pyramid_who is using repoze.who *v2*
- repoze.who.plugins.ldap is using repoze.who *v1* http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnarea/repoze.who.plugins.ldap/trunk/view/head:/setup.py - repoze.who.plugins.ldap is no longer maintained ( for two years ) https://answers.launchpad.net/repoze.who.plugins.ldap/+question/147245 So I fear it's a dead end... Is there an other package pluggable in pyramid for ldap authentication? If I write my own one, (taking code from who ldap), what would be the best way to integrated it in pyramid? Thanks! Le vendredi 22 juillet 2011 21:15:24 UTC+2, Mike Orr a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jay T wrote: > > We are starting to write a new application in Pyramid and having spent > some > > time reading the documentation available on your website, I have some > > questions regarding Authentication: > > > > Pyramid offers few ways of performing Authentication (out of the box) and > > also provides the capability to write a custom Authentication policy by > > implementing the IAuthenticationPolicy interface. > > The question I have is can I rely on repoze.who's authentication and > > integrate it within pyramid ? > > I have also looked at pyramid_who package which implements > > IAuthenticationPolicy using repoze.who. However, does this package work > in > > conjunction with repoze.who plugins ? > > > > I am interested in using the repoze.who.ldap plugin to perform ldap based > > authentication. Is it possible to use pyramid.who package to do that ? > > If not, can I install repoze.who and rely entirely on it effectively > > bypassing Pyramid's authentication ? > > Well, I'll be looking at that later this year when I port my Pylons > app with a hybrid LDAP+local db users, but I don't have any comment at > this point. I'll consider either repoze.who connected to Pyramid's > auth, or a custom authenticator if that's too messy. I'd have to write > a custom module for repoze.who in any case, and I'm not sure going > through Who's API would be worth the effort. On the other hand, I' > would like to use Who's automatic fallback to Authorized headers > instead of forms for non-interactive user agents. > > -- > Mike Orr > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/-/UTzpCo_tcbgJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
