Le 12/04/2012 15:58, Michael Merickel a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Domen Kožar<[email protected]> wrote:
Having something like djangopackages.com + pypi classifier would achieve the
same goal. Pull requests are also easy to make, I would propose rather to
have a good read about preferred way of contributing to package maintainers.
I'm much more +1 on maintaining and improving
http://pyramid.opencomparison.org/ (djangopackages). I've also
requested on catalog-sig a "Framework :: Pyramid" trove classifier. I
think in the era of DVCS it doesn't make much sense to attempt to
manage organizations and commit access rights.
For me it is now about managing rights, it is just to avoid packages
deletion.
In any case everyone get commit rights, so there are no real managment,
just a deletion barrier.
the djangopackages and the collective just complete themselves.
Its like http://plone.org/products and the collective, they complete
themselves and are both neccesary.
You and your
maintainers own the project repo, other people can submit pull
requests. What is more important is that the source repositories are
easy to find,
But not then really that simple to contribute. It is a 'less' open way
in my opinion.
for which I think the opencomparison page does a good
job. I think the opencomparison page needs much more visibility within
the community.
Yes, the links must be replicated to as many places we can.
--
Cordialement,
kiorky
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
