Hi Robert, Thanks for the info, I applied a custom patch to "pyramid.view.view_config()" to add a "depth=N" argument and setting "view_config(..., depth=2)" inside the imported decorator fixes everything. I'll see if I can submit a patch to the Pyramid project.
Thanks! André On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:02:38 AM UTC-4, Robert Forkel wrote: > > Hi André, > i guess this is with venusian >= 1.0a6. I ran into a similar problem > with cornice, and managed to find a workaround: > > https://github.com/xrotwang/cornice/commit/dbbf07fb50a100c9357eef47668528cb83096c9b > > Note the depth argument passed explicitely to venusian.attach which > controls down to which depth venusian will go down the import stack > (although i didn't fully understand this feature and the need for it > myself). > This may be not possible in your case, though, if you are not calling > venusian.attach in your own code but rely on view_config. > regards > robert > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:30 PM, andre.l.caron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi All! > > > > I've encountered what I believe to be a bug in Pyramid and I hope you > can > > help me find a solution or workaround :-) > > > > I have some rather redundant code in Pyramid views and I'm trying to > > refactor it into a decorator. The idea is that this decorator will > return a > > Pyramid view function decorated with @view_config and the redundant code > > will be put into this "generated" function so that it automagically > applies > > in all view functions. This works fine, but as soon as I move my > decorator > > to a seperate module and import it (it needs to be used from multiple > > modules that define views) then I get HTTP 404 errors. > > > > I've taken a look at the Pyramid and Venusian source code, but I'm not > > familiar with some of the more advanced stuff going on in Venusian to > > properly determine exactly why this doesn't work. > > > > I've attached an SSCCE[1] (~100 lines of code,with comments) that > > demonstrates this problem. Can you please take a look at it and confirm > > that this is a bug (or not)? > > > > Note: I've tried to keep this as close to possible to how it's used in > the > > real application. Keep in mind that this is legacy code and I'm not > behind > > all the decisions (e.g. the do-it-yourself-RPC framework ;-) > > > > Thanks, > > André Caron > > > > [1]: http://sscce.org/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "pylons-discuss" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/-/V39AjAbHCmgJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/-/_eQQVMzMkJIJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
