I'd say that if Google's Python is anything like the standard CPython, then Chameleon's performance should be "fast enough" – but I believe Jinja is somewhat more optimized, presumably also because the language is not as complex.
\malthe On 11 December 2012 01:59, Michael Lenaghan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm starting to put together a Pyramid-based app that's meant to run on > Google App Engine. I'd like to be able to use Chameleon for templates, but > I've seen reports of it being slow in that environment. The problem is that > the reports I've come across all seem to be a couple of years old; in the > meantime Google has introduced the 2.7 runtime (with some key bytecode > modification changes: > https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/python25/diff27#Bytecode_Modification), > and Chameleon itself has continued to evolve. > > My question, then, is this: does anyone know if Chameleon is competitive > with Jinja2 *on App Engine*? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-discuss/-/NUOcXU48RdsJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. -- Au revoir, et tous mes voeux pour un avenir plein de succès et de bonheur –– Malthe Borch [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
