On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm still supporting two Pylons 1 applications and three Pylons 0.9.7 >> applications. So yes, a "with all dependencies" distribution would be >> helpful. > > > > In the case of things like WebOb and Routes, and others, it might make sense > to at least drop the ">=" in setup.py/requirements.txt and replace with an > '=='
Yes, that would be worth putting in a Pylons 1.0.2. We also need to ensure compatible dependencies remain on PyPI. That may mean sending an email to the maintainers telling them we're still using version X and will need it "permanently". -- Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
