Could you use nginx + uwsgi/gunicorn/etc ? I'm generally anti-Apache because I don't like the memory/process management model and miscellaneous concurrency issues ( handling the number, and also dealing with slow connections/hangups ). If you ran mod_wsgi, I would make really suggest you either have nginx or a "Vanilla" apache on Port 80 that proxies to your mod_wsgi, or use Varnish as a load balancer. This has nothing to do with mod_wsgi, you just absolutely need to keep static traffic and direct clients off of dynamic apache servers.
I have waitress serving a site in production, and it's been fine. It's fronted by nginx though, which just proxies dynamic requests back to the waitress port. Nginx handles all the connections and static files. personally, I've been happiest with nginx+uwsgi. that's my preference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
