Wait, what? No.
Pyramid provides you a way to provide different session implementations, that should NOT be recreated WITHIN the session implementation itself. That’s like providing a session factory factory. That’s insane. > On Mar 2, 2016, at 13:11 , Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 1:46:06 PM UTC-5, Bert JW Regeer wrote: > There already is a hook. The session factory. > > That's a hook in Pyramid. > > I mean that packages like pyramid_beaker, pyramid_redis_sessions, etc should > have a standard hook to support alternate sessions for bots. I had looked at > some session usage on my public facing projects, and the amount of sessions > from indexing bots was substantial. > > WIthout a hook in these projects, you will need to always create custom > session factories -- leaving the default session factory integration not very > usable. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
