Unfortunately, no. My changes do not contain functionality for signature verification.
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 12:17:48 AM UTC-7, James Bennett Saxon wrote: > > Ah great! I'll take a look! > > I'm not all that sure what's new and or old at stripe but they're now > recommending verifying signatures. > <https://stripe.com/docs/webhooks#signatures> So perhaps the back and > forth suggested by launchdarkly > <http://blog.launchdarkly.com/best-practices-for-testing-stripe-webhook-event-processing/> > > is no longer necessary. > > Have you added in the signature verification? > > Thanks for the response! > > On another note, what kinds of data are you storing on your system to > interface with stripe? I'm trying to MVP my project and am not sure what > data I should be keeping on my side. Seems like customer token is the > critical piece. Can I just keep that and handle everything else on stripe > via the API? Thanks again! > > On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 at 9:30:04 AM UTC-8, Vincent Catalano wrote: >> >> I have a fork of the project that has a number of updates. You can check >> it out: https://github.com/vcatalano/pyramid_stripe. I haven't looked at >> it in a while though. >> >> On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 at 12:58:39 AM UTC-7, James Bennett Saxon >> wrote: >>> >>> Ok, so something kept bothering me about pyramid_stripe only using the >>> api_key and I realized it was that it's not calling >>> `stripe.Webhook.construct_event`. So it might require a little more >>> tweaking. >>> >>> On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 9:38:06 PM UTC-8, James Bennett Saxon >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have been pondering how to handle the heap of webhooks that stripe >>>> spits out. This small library seems like a great interface to that API. >>>> >>>> Alternatively in a Stripe best practices post >>>> <http://blog.launchdarkly.com/best-practices-for-testing-stripe-webhook-event-processing/>, >>>> >>>> there was a suggestion to avoid processing authentic calls by using the >>>> only the event ID and then querying Stripe to get the event data (to avoid >>>> processing imposter events). With such a minimal interface, this might >>>> avoid the need for this layer perhaps as @ChrisRossi pointed out. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure which way I'll go yet. >>>> >>>> I may fork it. >>>> >>>> On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 1:08:16 PM UTC-8, Silviu Dicu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking for a package that will allow payment management with >>>>> Stripe integrated with Pyramid. >>>>> >>>>> Found https://github.com/jkoelker/pyramid_stripe but the author says >>>>> is not updating it anymore nor >>>>> he released it to pypi. >>>>> >>>>> thanks! >>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/dbfc7de1-c2a4-4736-9cfd-dcd95ea14862%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
