On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 8:45:45 AM UTC-4, Tres Seaver wrote: > > > Somewhere after there, i believe. It depends on the server. uwsgi and > > unicorn do it in different places. i think waitress essentially does it > > too. > > Waitress is not a forking implementation: it uses threads. >
Yes, Sorry, I should have been more clear. The SqlAlchemy session/pool/connection is not forksafe and not threadsafe. For the purpose of dealing with this type of situation (database connection in main routine), forked and threaded workers are affected similarly and essentially the same. I was hoping to convey that switching from gunicorn/uwsgi to the waitress won't necessarily address this – one needs to `dispose()` of the pool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/b1f6936d-cf40-4d8f-98e6-d154c8a2e7fb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.