> > On the minus side, the dependency injection system seemed far from clear > to me. But the two biggest problems, for my needs, were: > > - FastAPI doesn't offer rich security policies (the security system in > Pyramid is based on Zope's, with roles, permissions, ACLs, route factories, > contexts, etc.). Itonly offers "Oauth2 scopes", which can represent global > permissions. So, no contextual permissions, workflows, etc, at least not > with a substantial amount of work. > > - FastAPI doesn't seem to allow application composition the way Pyramid > does (the exact term in the Pyramid docs is "extending an application") >
Would it be possible to mix the best parts of FastAPI and Pyramid? - FastAPI for schema generation and validation - Pyramid as a web server and routing As pointed our earlier, FastAPI uses Starlette web server. Would we be able to replace Starlette with Pyramid? Or more generally: Do we have any OpenAPI specification (YAML, JSON) generation tools from Pyramid endpoints? (As discussed earlier, we have the opposite, manually writing YAML and then importing it through pyramid_openapi3). Br, Mikko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/CAK8RCUtrjtxH3dneehNu9mQzz28s4G3g1gMvu1iC1ziFrR6afg%40mail.gmail.com.
