I don't know what you should do. I was just saying the Debian packages use 3.4, not 4.0. If you're not using the packages then ignore me (or try them, if you can, and see if it helps).
-matthew chan kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > It seems that the problem comes from the libgcj bug which does not allow > handling of filesize > larger than 2GB. I read another posting ( > > http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/pylucene-dev/2005-February/000507.html) > and I think my situation is somewhat similar to that case... > However, i did not quite get your comment... Do you mean I should stick > with ver3.4.4? > Is it impossible to upgrade gcj version to gcj4.0? > > -chan > > 2006/3/18, Matthew O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > chan kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > To my surprise, the 12GB file was successfully > > created... Does this mean that it has nothing to do > > with the linux file size limit? My gcc version is 4.x > > (gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian > > 4.0.2-9)). , file system ext3, and kernel version is > > debian 2.6.15 After reading the posting, I started to > > seriously consider about actually "downgrading" to gcc > > version 3.5.0, because he said that worked... > > Sorry, I don't know anything about the optimize() problems > you mentioned above. However, are you using the packages > for Debian Stable (Sarge) (mentioned on the website)? If so > then you're actually using 3.4.4's runtime. > > Andi has said in the past that he has "had little luck" with > GCC 4. So, perhaps trying 3.4 is a good idea. > > -matthew > _______________________________________________ > pylucene-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev > _______________________________________________ > pylucene-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
