On Friday 22 September 2006 13:52, Andi Vajda wrote: > A PyLucene user just submitted a patch to PyLucene to integrate Solr's > PrefixFilter class. PyLucene is not PySolr but it looks like PrefixFilter > has nothing specific to Solr in it and PrefixFilter could be useful to > regular Lucene users as well. > > Are there any objections to checking org.apache.solr.search.PrefixFilter > into Lucene's search package ? I could submit a patch, but codewise, it's > trivial enough to just rename the package it's in to > org.apache.lucene.search. > > What do you think ?
As a person who drives his developers nuts about these things on a regular basis, I think a single search package for all of the modules is good here. Users of these classes dislike when ipmort names change and probably don't care where they come from (in terms of original developer) to begin with. And there's no law that says Pylucene can't be a superset of Java Lucene. ;) -- Peter Fein [EMAIL PROTECTED] 773-575-0694 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~pfein/ irc://irc.freenode.net/#chipy _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
