Andi Vajda wrote: > > A PyLucene user just submitted a patch to PyLucene to integrate Solr's > PrefixFilter class. PyLucene is not PySolr but it looks like > PrefixFilter has nothing specific to Solr in it and PrefixFilter could > be useful to regular Lucene users as well. > > Are there any objections to checking org.apache.solr.search.PrefixFilter > into Lucene's search package ? I could submit a patch, but codewise, > it's trivial enough to just rename the package it's in to > org.apache.lucene.search. > > What do you think ?
I think I'd rather have it available apart until the PrefixFilter will
be included to the Lucene core itself. Main reason is the fact that the
reference API for PyLucene is the Lucene core. As well, It might confuse
people, I guess, to find some third party code in PyLucene they can't
find in the Java Lucene version.
J.
--
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
Open Source ECM - http://www.nuxeo.com
Nuxeo 5 : http://www.nuxeo.org
Mobile: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
