Dear PyMol experts: When using Open-Source PyMOL 0.99rc6 I read in a pdb file which has 40 coordinate sets (each is one frame in an animation) each beginning with: HEADER Output iset= n "xxxx_G=r_0_01" then a list of the pdb coordinates and ending with: ENDMDL "n" ranges from 0 to 39. This results in the following output: HEADER Output iset= 0 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" HEADER Output iset= 1 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" ObjectMolReadPDBStr: read MODEL 1 ObjectMolReadPDBStr: read MODEL 2 etc. ... ObjectMolReadPDBStr: read MODEL 39 ObjectMolReadPDBStr: read MODEL 40 CmdLoad: "/home/psstern/pymol/xxxx_G=r_0_01.pdb" loaded as "xxxx_G=r_0_01".
This then displays one molecule with 40 frames and the animation can be activated by clicking on the red arrow. However, when using Open-Source PyMOL 1.3 the same file results in different behavior. Instead of reading in one object with 40 frames it reads in 40 different objects and displays all of them. The output I get is: HEADER Output iset= 0 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" HEADER Output iset= 1 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" HEADER Output iset= 2 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" etc. ... HEADER Output iset= 38 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" HEADER Output iset= 39 "xxxx_G=r_0_01" CmdLoad: loaded 40 objects from "/home/psstern/pymol/xxxx_G=r_0_01.pdb". Is this a bug or am I missing some parameter which is set differently by default for the two versions? I couldn't find a solution in the on-line documentation. Regards, Peter Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net) Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
