hey,
just wanted to ask if you could find something on why the mutagenesis 
wizard is destroying the ordering of atoms?

Is this perhaps fixed in the latest versions? Then a download would make 
sense.

Thanks, Martin




Am 13.12.10 16:52, schrieb Jason Vertrees:
> Hi Martin,
>
> As you've found, the mutagenesis wizard destroys the ordering in some
> cases.  I'll look into it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Jason
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Martin Hediger<ma....@bluewin.ch>  wrote:
>> Good day
>> I use PyMOL to introduce mutations into a structure. It occured to me that
>> when saving the modified structure, atom sequence was not preserved. Using
>>
>> set retain_order
>> set pdb_retain_ids
>>
>> is supposed to control this. It seems now, as if mutating a structure does a
>> really weired thing:
>> Once the mutation is introduced, the sequence becomes completely disordered
>> in a sense that the atoms of the "new" residue are placed in between the
>> atoms of the very first residue, in terms of sequence (not geometry).
>> This results in a PDB file like this (PRO is the first residue, PHE is the
>> residue to which the mutation is being carried out):
>>
>> ATOM      1  N   PRO A   1      53.611  -4.470  40.679  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> N
>> TER       2      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      0  N   PHE D  14      55.428  -5.717  38.365  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> N
>> TER       1      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      2  CA  PRO A   1      52.399  -3.722  40.197  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       3      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      1  CA  PHE D  14      55.821  -4.897  37.223  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       2      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      3  C   PRO A   1      52.805  -2.296  39.783  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       4      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      2  CB  PHE D  14      54.681  -4.879  36.160  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       3      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      4  O   PRO A   1      53.381  -1.530  40.550  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> O
>> TER       5      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      3  CG  PHE D  14      54.928  -4.027  34.905  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       4      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      5  CB  PRO A   1      51.360  -3.675  41.342  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       6      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      4  CD1 PHE D  14      56.116  -4.189  34.183  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       5      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      6  CG  PRO A   1      52.019  -4.362  42.549  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       7      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      5  CD2 PHE D  14      54.011  -3.049  34.512  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       6      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      7  CD  PRO A   1      53.253  -5.096  41.996  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       8      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      6  CE1 PHE D  14      56.391  -3.370  33.093  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       7      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      8  HA  PRO A   1      51.990  -4.297  39.323  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER       9      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      7  CE2 PHE D  14      54.282  -2.238  33.413  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       8      PHE D  14
>> ATOM      9 1HB  PRO A   1      50.434  -4.192  41.043  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER      10      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      8  CZ  PHE D  14      55.473  -2.397  32.707  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER       9      PHE D  14
>> ATOM     10 2HB  PRO A   1      51.070  -2.637  41.594  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER      11      PRO A   1
>> ATOM      9  C   PHE D  14      56.113  -3.478  37.649  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> C
>> TER      10      PHE D  14
>> ATOM     11 1HG  PRO A   1      51.327  -5.056  43.052  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER      12      PRO A   1
>> ATOM     10  O   PHE D  14      55.357  -2.867  38.421  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> O
>> TER      11      PHE D  14
>> ATOM     12 2HG  PRO A   1      52.313  -3.615  43.311  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER      13      PRO A   1
>> ATOM     11 1HD  PHE D  14      56.847  -4.922  34.497  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>> TER      12      PHE D  14
>> ATOM     13 1HD  PRO A   1      54.110  -5.062  42.704  1.00  0.00      PROT
>> H
>>
>>
>> Can this be explained somehow?
>>
>> Thanks for your answers.
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09.11.10 13:26, Jason Vertrees wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> set retain_order
>>> set pdb_retain_ids
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -- Jason
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Martin Hediger<ma....@bluewin.ch>    wrote:
>>>> Dear all
>>>> It occured to me that PyMOL is resequencing a structure when saving. I
>>>> am trying to interpolate between two structures where it is critical to
>>>> have identical sequence in both structures. Is it possible submit a
>>>> <DO_NOT_RESEQUENCE>-option to the save command?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
>>>> David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a
>>>> Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your
>>>> business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
>>>> Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
>>>> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>
>>>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to