Mr. Thomas Holder,

Many thanks for your help.
I can manage it.

Best regards,
Koji

2019年6月26日(水) 18:56 Thomas Holder <thomas.hol...@schrodinger.com>:

> Hi Koji,
>
> Yes it is my understanding that sphere_scale 1.1932 would correspond to
> 30% probability.
>
> Cheers,
>   Thomas
>
> > On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, koji naka <pasuvn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr. Thomas Holder,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your kind reply.
> > I am very happy to know the scale factor for the 50% probability, but I
> don't understand well.
> > From the table, can I take a value the scale? For example, in case of
> 30% probability, is it ok to set " set sphere_scale,  1.1932"? or not?
> >
> > I am sorry for bothering you again.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Koji
> >
> > 2019年6月25日(火) 18:49 Thomas Holder <thomas.hol...@schrodinger.com>:
> > Hi Koji,
> >
> > Interesting question, I wasn't aware of the ellipsoid_probability
> setting.
> >
> > The probability to radius conversion is done with a lookup table, see:
> >
> https://github.com/schrodinger/pymol-open-source/blob/d1359f125d/layer2/RepEllipsoid.cpp#L114
> >
> > To get sphere scaling equivalent of ellipsoid_probability=0.5, you can
> do:
> >
> > set sphere_scale, 1.53820
> >
> > I calculated this value with the following script:
> >
> > problevel = [ \
> >   0.4299, 0.5479, 0.6334, 0.7035, 0.7644, \
> >   0.8192, 0.8694, 0.9162, 0.9605, 1.0026, \
> >   1.0430, 1.0821, 1.1200, 1.1570, 1.1932, \
> >   1.2288, 1.2638, 1.2985, 1.3330, 1.3672, \
> >   1.4013, 1.4354, 1.4695, 1.5037, 1.5382, \
> >   1.5729, 1.6080, 1.6436, 1.6797, 1.7164, \
> >   1.7540, 1.7924, 1.8318, 1.8724, 1.9144, \
> >   1.9580, 2.0034, 2.0510, 2.1012, 2.1544, \
> >   2.2114, 2.2730, 2.3404, 2.4153, 2.5003, \
> >   2.5997, 2.7216, 2.8829, 3.1365, 6.0000 ]
> >
> > iprob = int((cmd.get_setting_float('ellipsoid_probability') + 0.01) * 50
> - 1)
> > pradius = problevel[iprob]
> >
> > cmd.set('sphere_scale', pradius *
> cmd.get_setting_float('ellipsoid_scale'))
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Thomas
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 7:21 AM, koji naka <pasuvn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > The size of isotropic atoms plotted by using "alter all, vdw =
> sqrt(b/8)/pi" and "show sphere" looks small compared with the size of
> anisotropic atoms displayed by "show ellipsoid" in PyMOL default setting
> with 50% probability.
> > >
> > > How can I plot the isotropic atoms with 50% probability?
> > >
> > > The data is a pdb file converted from a cif through Mercury software.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your help.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Koji
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > PyMOL-users mailing list
> > > Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Unsubscribe:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Holder
> > PyMOL Principal Developer
> > Schrödinger, Inc.
> >
>
> --
> Thomas Holder
> PyMOL Principal Developer
> Schrödinger, Inc.
>
>
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe

Reply via email to