Sean Lynch wrote: > Please no. Porting modules to ctypes is well worth the effort because > then they will work with Jython and IronPython as well as CPython and > PyPy. IMHO the CPython extension API is the "wrong" way to extend Python > and has been since the beginning, not least because it assumes > implementation details of the interpreter like reference counting, > object layout, etc.
I have tons of code using boost::python. Wouldn't it be a lot of work to port to ctypes? I'm guessing, it's basically a complete rewrite. > James Matthews wrote: >> Why not if Cpython can then pypy can ! >> >> On 1/23/07, Simon Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Not likely. >>> >>> Simon. >>> >>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:29:00 -0500 >>> Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> > Subject says it all. Will I be able to use my existing c (c++ >>> actually) >>> > modules? >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] >>> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] >> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
