* Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 14:56:27 -0500]: > Sean Lynch wrote: > > > Please no. Porting modules to ctypes is well worth the effort because > > then they will work with Jython and IronPython as well as CPython and > > PyPy. IMHO the CPython extension API is the "wrong" way to extend Python > > and has been since the beginning, not least because it assumes > > implementation details of the interpreter like reference counting, > > object layout, etc. > > I have tons of code using boost::python. Wouldn't it be a lot of work to > port to ctypes? I'm guessing, it's basically a complete rewrite.
Is it even feasible to wrap a C++ library with ctypes? -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
