David Cournapeau wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: >> >> Yes, this one would be a major challenge. If you can crack it and the >> PyPy interpreter offers another benefit (an obvious one is speed), you >> will be in awesome position. If not, the other benefits will have to >> weigh more strongly. This is definitely one to evolve slowly over time >> if it's possible at all. > I don't understand the C++ part. How many useful python modules use C++ > ? For a start, my understanding is that python itself (interprter + > stdlib) do not use C++ at all. Wrapping C++ in any language other than > itself is a pain anyway :) > I use this extensively. I have a large library of signal processing that is written in c++ using boost-python. All the c++ code is written in generic style, with concrete instantiations exposed to python.
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
