Hey, On Nov 20, 2007 9:08 PM, Alexander Kellett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: > > The perception could easily arise that there is no interest in > > giving an > > impression of commitment, and thus not to expect a production-quality > > Python interpreter in the foreseeable future. Is this perception > > correct? Are people even talking about giving a level of commitment, > > or > > is this whole discussion uninteresting to the project altogether? I'd > > like to know so I can adjust my own perception accordingly. > > This thread is getting a bit repetitive.
Yes. For about half a year now. > If you really want pypy to become "production quality", then Q&A is > needed, so start a compatibility testing project or something... With this level of commitment to support this from the PyPy team I think people will be seriously discouraged from putting any of their time in it. When I put time in something, I want to know I can get something back from it within a reasonable time frame. I want to have the impression that the team behind the project cares about this kind of use. I'm trying to find out. I've been trying to find out for half a year. So far I'm pretty discouraged by the answers, or non-answers. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
