Hey, On Nov 20, 2007 5:49 PM, Richard Emslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > To be more accurate - what was found was that the overhead of calling in > and out of the of the generated extension module outweighed the gain in > speed generated by the rpython code. Also the generated code was not 100% > stable and even though I spent a few weeks hacking the generated code, it > was still segfaulting (whereas the non extension module was fine.) All in > all I agree that removing the current implementation is the best course of > action for moving forward.
Great! I also understood from the previous discussions the old way was broken. But you talk about moving forward - is the plan to get back to establish the original feature again with new technology? That's not the impression I got from the email, but it'd be great if my impression was wrong. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
