Sounds reasonable to me.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jan de Mooij <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi fijal, > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I probably have missed some part of discussion, but - shouldn't we >> have it present the same interface as lib/array.py? If lib/array.py is >> not needed, since we use the C version, how about killing lib/array? > > I added it only to the test directory as it's not yet ready. We need > suport for __setitem__ and iterators (should be easy though) and some > other pieces. Once that's done it can probably replace lib/array.py on > pypy-c. It would be interesting to benchmark it against CPython to > test cpyext overhead. >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] >> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
