On 18/11/10 01:17, Dan Stromberg wrote: Hi Dan,
[cut] > Given #1 and #2 above, anydbm should continue working, due to the presence of > gdbm and dumbdbm. > > I guess I think that if someone has a need for bsddb (and it's assorted > interfaces), they probably should work on that. > > Sound reasonable? Yes. To me it sounds reasonable. I don't know if it's correct because I never used any of those modules, but it's surely reasoable :-). I think that the best would be if you get an account on codespeak and do that in a branch: this way we can follow your commits and the if everything is fine we merge it. I personally cannot create new accounts on codespeak, so you should ask someone else for this (e.g. Armin Rigo): the easiest way is if you just come on #pypy on freenode.net and talk with us "real-time". ciao, Anto _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
