On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Antonio Cuni <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/11/10 01:17, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > [cut] > > Given #1 and #2 above, anydbm should continue working, due to the presence >> of >> gdbm and dumbdbm. >> >> I guess I think that if someone has a need for bsddb (and it's assorted >> interfaces), they probably should work on that. >> >> Sound reasonable? >> > > Yes. To me it sounds reasonable. I don't know if it's correct because I > never used any of those modules, but it's surely reasoable :-). > > I think that the best would be if you get an account on codespeak and do > that in a branch: this way we can follow your commits and the if everything > is fine we merge it. > > I personally cannot create new accounts on codespeak, so you should ask > someone else for this (e.g. Armin Rigo): the easiest way is if you just come > on #pypy on freenode.net and talk with us "real-time". > > ciao, > Anto > I've created a branch at http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/branch/gdbm and made the proposed changes in it. I took the liberty of creating an "attic" directory to put dbm.py in. Please let me know if there are further changes required related to this. Thanks!
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
