On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:53 +0200, Miquel Torres wrote:
> They *are* being merged. The question here is to have branches *now*,
> as we can't know how long it will take for speed.python.org to be
> online.

yes, makes sense.  Better invest your time in getting branch benchmarking to
work right now, it's probably the best support for pypy development ATM.

> All things considered, I think the way to go would be to keep current
> speed.pypy.org hosting if at all possible until PyPy moves to
> speed.python.org. If that can be done, we can upgrade the current
> setup in no time.

This is fine by me - i am still paying for the underlying machine
and so it's not fine indefinitely.  OTOH people could just
go to our pypy.org donation page and i could ask for some hosting
costs at some point (*).

best,
holger

(*) then again, who knows what the current global currencies will be
    worth in a few years or months, anyway.  Better put money to good use ;)
 
 
> 2011/7/12 holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu>:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 09:19 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Miquel Torres <tob...@googlemail.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Branches are already implemented. speed.pypy.org just needs to be
> >> > upgraded to Codespeed 0.8.x and its data migrated.
> >>
> >> I can help you with that, but that means having local changes from
> >> speed.pypy.org commited somewhere else.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > That has not yet been done because we wanted to move to ep.io, which
> >> > has not yet happend, and we are working on speed.python.org and
> >> > somehow things have stalled.
> >>
> >> speed.python.org is completely irrelevant here.
> >
> > Probably i am missing something but couldn't speed.pypy.org and
> > speed.python.org mostly merge?  (maybe except for the front page and
> > default comparisons/settings but those could be easily hosted wherever)
> >
> > best,
> > holger
> >
> >> > Migrating current speed.pypy.org (I mean keeping it on the current
> >> > server but upgrading) would not take me very long. But it is on the
> >> > way out...
> >>
> >> We either should do the ep.io move (data has been imported up until
> >> very recently) or upgrade now.
> >
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2011/7/12 Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> On 12/07/11 09:01, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> >> >>> I'll follow up on the branches, but the issue is a bit irrelevant - we
> >> >>> still have performance regressions by trunk checkins as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> it's not irrelevant. I won't solve the current issues, but it will help 
> >> >> having
> >> >> more in the future.
> >> >>
> >> >> ciao,
> >> >> Anto
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> pypy-dev mailing list
> >> >> pypy-dev@python.org
> >> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pypy-dev mailing list
> >> pypy-dev@python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
> >>
> >
> 
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to