On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote:
> Hi Alex, > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > speed.pypy.org shows 27df (45168) as being fast, but 058e (45254) as > being > > slow, I narrowed it down to 45168:45205, ad there's only one reasonable > > commit in that range. > > The trick is that the two revisions I identify as culprit are (on > tannit) revision numbers r45155 and r45156, i.e. sequentially before > r45168 (which has on my repo on tannit the number r45170). We have > this structure, all on the "default" branch: > > r45176 > | > r45174 > / \ > r45156 \ > | r45170 > r45155 / > \ / > r45154 > > This means that you'll miss the two revisions r45155 and r45156 if you > do 45168:45205. In other words it's always subtly wrong to work with > plain intervals of revision numbers in hg... The speed.pypy.org measured > 45170 to be still fast, but I measured all of 45176, 45156 and 45155 > to be slow. This is why I claim that the culprit is r45155. > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. > Now I'm really confused, what sha does that correspond to? https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/45155 seems to indicate that it is a rather boring commit on a branch? Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
