On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Gary Robinson <gary...@me.com> wrote: > I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have another poll, this time clearly > differentiating between > > a) focusing on integrating the existing numpy in such a way that scipy and > other such packages are also enabled, probably using the existing project to > provide a C interface that IronPython and other Python variants can use; or > > b) the current path of replacing much of numpy, making it much faster but > leaving scipy out in the cold for quite some time. > > I don't think it's clear, at this point, which approach would generate more > monetary contributions. I suspect it might be (a) because of commercial > scientific research that depends on scipy. Of course, if the path decision is > already firm, then such a poll would be moot. >
It's however clear which approach is harder and more painful. I for one don't subscribe for emulating all the subtleties of CPython C API nor numpy API. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
