Hi Armin:
________________________________
From: Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org>
To: Bengt Richter <b...@oz.net>
Cc: pypy-dev@python.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] STM/AME for CPython?
>Actually I think we need foremost a new name. This is not about doing
>great things in any of the domains you list. It has no obvious
>connexion to any separation of metadata, security, capability,
>distributed update, mobile, or any other specific environment. This is
>merely about adding a new one-liner API usable by programs in order to
>behave as if they were run serially, but actually run on multiple
>cores. So even using the name "STM" is rather wrong and confusing:
>STM is only one possible implementation.
To me the goal is to create a simple, non-evasive (an
aspect being composability) clutter free form of concurrency. In short a
Pythonic
approach.
A suggestion: Pythonic Concrrency Control : PCC or PyCC
Cheers,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
